On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 22:01:00 -0700 "Rodney D. Myers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Wed, 25 Aug 2004 20:52:01 -0400 >Chris Metzler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>On Thu, 26 Aug 2004 10:24:06 +1000 >>Clement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Wayne Topa wrote: >>>> >>>>On both occasions you hi-jacked another thread rather then >>>>starting a new one (bad practice). >>> >>> >>> I DID NOT hi-jack anything. >> >> Yes, you did. > > Not according to Sylpheed. Both times he started new threads
You mean the client I use? (From the X-Mailer header, it looks
like we're even using the same version of claws)
Perhaps you'd previously deleted the messages to which he replied?
When Sylpheed is unable to attach a message to a thread in the
right place because the immediately previous message is not present,
it places the message as if a new thread has begun, IIRC.
The "References:" header clears up such things.
-c
--
Chris Metzler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(remove "snip-me." to email)
"As a child I understood how to give; I have forgotten this grace since I
have become civilized." - Chief Luther Standing Bear
pgpD27o0RKQNX.pgp
Description: PGP signature
