John Summerfield writes:
> I know shorewall 2.0 as packaged for Debian has an empty /etc/shorewall,
> but why it shouldn't be full of sample config files containing lots of
> interesting comments I really don't know.

Because you have not filed a bug with a patch containing such a file.

> Even where the developer finds it absolutely necessary to generate config
> files at install time, I don't see why there can't be (maybe empty, maybe
> entirely commented out) config files to replace.

That's exactly what I was suggesting.  However, I see no point in putting
anything in a file that is going to be overwritten at installation.
-- 
John Hasler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to