On Tue, 24 Aug 2004, Thomas Adam wrote: > On Tue, Aug 24, 2004 at 08:23:16AM -0500, John Hasler wrote: > > Just off the top of my head I see no reason why these files could not be > > included in the package empty and filled in by the scripts. This would > > identify the files as belonging to the package and also allow dpkg to > > remove them, eliminating the need for the postrm to do so. > > The overhead in doing this is stupid, and having a lot of empty files in /etc > is just pointless.
But we could be doing that if it worked. It doesn't. Hint: empty files, as well as missing files, are valid states of a conffile and dpkg would act accordingly. -- "One disk to rule them all, One disk to find them. One disk to bring them all and in the darkness grind them. In the Land of Redmond where the shadows lie." -- The Silicon Valley Tarot Henrique Holschuh -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
