Hello
Daniel M. (<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>) wrote:
> [umask is not set properly for some files on FAT fs]
>
> Here is a list of umask's values and permissions those files are
> actually getting ('correct' means that they are getting the same
> permissions as all the other files):
>
> umask=0000: -r-xr-xr-x
> umask=0111: -r--r--r--
> umask=0222: correct
> umask=0333: correct
> umask=0444: ---x--x--x
> umask=0555: ----------
> umask=0666: correct
> umask=0777: correct
>
> Why those (and many other) files are different and don't get the
> correct permissions specified by 'umask' option?
I didn't see it yesterday, but it seems that is is always the write bit
that does not get set properly. The umask values that work are only
those that do /not/ allow writing to all files.
Is it possible that the files have been marked "read-only" in Windows
and that mount respects that setting?
best regards
Andreas Janssen
--
Andreas Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
PGP-Key-ID: 0xDC801674 ICQ #17079270
Registered Linux User #267976
http://www.andreas-janssen.de/debian-tipps.html
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
