On Monday 16 August 2004 02:33 pm, Anders Breindahl wrote: > I and a friend are playing with the idea of convincing our gymnasium > to using Debian GNU/Linux as their main server OS. > > As it comes to this issue, which release we would want; stable, > testing or unstable? > > Making the choice, it would matter that the focus is on reliability. > We would want it to be absolutely reliable and secure. No security > flaws would be accepted. On the other hand, we wouldn't want it to be > outdated, so any performance-fixes are not included. What is the best > compromise? > > Regards, skrewz a.k.a. Anders Breindahl.
I think Sarge is up to the task, set up your sources.list for Sarge not testing. There are security updates for Sarge now. This is a bit of a balance between utterly reliable (not a stable release yet) but current versions of software. -- Greg C. Madden -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
