On Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:54:33 -0600 (MDT)
"Nate Duehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> On Wed, August 11, 2004 5:58, James said:
> 
> > Let's face it, most of linux's problems are a result on not being
> > about to recruit a sufficient talent pool of low level embedded
> > developers. Most of those that do convert (after a convoluted
> > learning path) end up at a proprietary shop that puts linux on a
> > processor, and hides the key low level details.....
> 
> I would add a note here, a recent discussion of licenses on an
> embedded microcontroller list that shall remain anonymous pointed out
> that the GPL(and more appropriately the LGPL)'s restrictions on static
> linking make it VERY difficult to develop for embedded processors
> using Linux and create a marketable product.
<snip>
> I'm just repeating this summary comment from another mailing list as
> I'm curious how the Debianistas feel about this.
<snip>

You mean like Actiontec did with their Dual-PC modem[1] where you can
download the GPL'd source code for the firmware[2]?

I thought it was a nice solution. The product works great and Linux
hackers can modify it to their heart's content.

[1]
http://www.actiontec.com/products/tech/modems/dual_pcmodem/dpm_overview.html
[2]
ftp://128.121.226.214/pub/dualpcmodem/actiontec_release_031017.tar.gz

Jacob

-- 
GnuPG Key: 1024D/16377135

Random .signature #38:
Windows NT -- it'll drive you buggy!

Attachment: pgpYV94NWLS3l.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to