On Mon, 9 Aug 2004 13:45:14 -0700 (PDT) Alvin Oga <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi ya "keep it in the list" :-0 > > On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, Monique Y. Mudama wrote: > > > Yup. I realize this. I'm just so frustrated. If I request no cc's > > in my sig, I get tons of mail telling me that I should use the > > headers instead. If I use the headers, I get cc'd. Actually, I got > > cc'd even with the request right there in the bloody sig. > > <rant> > using the email address of those that replied to your posts is > an extreme rude thing to do .... and further, you do NOT have > permission to use my domain name in emails *-you sent-* > > "keep it in the list <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" That's your mail server or client changing localhost to Mail.Linux-x-Consulting.com. Her Reply-To shows up as "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" here on my computer. Also note that it's just the Reply-To showing up as Mail.Linux-x-Consulting.com - not the From line. Mail-Followup-To effectively sets the Reply-To as being the mailing list, for mail clients that honor it, yet nobody accuses people of misusing the list address. > ( not that i'd care ... but ... it will mean you'd be treated > ( differently in the mailing list here ... :-) > </rant> Jacob -- GnuPG Key: 1024D/16377135 Random .signature #25: Microsoft: "You've got questions. We've got dancing paperclips."
pgpWDvAdtPjlZ.pgp
Description: PGP signature
