On Mon, 9 Aug 2004, John Summerfield wrote: > > >I personally think that policies on mailing lists shouldn't dictate > >things like reply-to (not that this one has been made publicly known > >other than through your rants), because some people prefer to get a > >reply-to (me, for example - reply-to means I can see any responses to > >me straight away without having to wait for the mailing list to do its > >thing), and I think it clutters the list to say "please reply to > >me". Let your mailer do its thing (set your own reply-to[1] as > >necessary, as you do), and hope that everyone respects it. > > > The list's settings should reflect its primary use. This is a discussion > list and its settings should reflect that.
So is eg. LKML. What I am saying, is all of these discussion lists have differnt policies. It's kind of silly expecting people to remember which policy belongs to which list, and blasting people when they get it wrong. -- TimC -- http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/staff/tconnors/ > As you know, Linus took the word the penguins kept saying over and > over again, rot13'ed it, and used that as the name of his OS. So, who's going to record this .au file: "Hello, my name is Yvahf Gbeinyqf, and I pronounce yvahk, yvahk." -- Anthony de Boer && Michel Buijsman @ ASR -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
