On Thu, Jul 15, 2004 at 02:44:41PM -0400, Andrew Perrin wrote:
> Is the following in /etc/fstab?
>
> none /proc/bus/usb usbdevfs defaults 0 0
I thought it was "usbfs"... Hmmm looking in a 2.4.23
Doc../usb/proc_usb_info.txt document:
**NOTE**: If /proc/bus/usb appears empty, and a host controller
driver has been linked, then you need to mount the
filesystem. Issue the command (as root):
mount -t usbfs none /proc/bus/usb
...
**NOTE**: The filesystem has been renamed from "usbdevfs" to
"usbfs", to reduce confusion with "devfs". You may
still see references to the older "usbdevfs" name.
I guess both work but it is migrating to usbfs. <shrug>
<snip>
>
> On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, Tom Brown wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have two machines that are identical in hardware. One is running RH 8.0
> > (kernel 2.4.18) and the other is running Debian Woody (kernel 2.4.26). The
> > machine running RH 8.0 shows all the USB ports in /proc/bus/usb. However, on
> > the machine running Debian, the /proc/bus/usb directory is empty. I used the
> > same .config file to build the kernels on each machine. Why is the Debian
> > machine not recognizing the USB ports?
snip
--
Chris Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-------------------------------------------
GNU/Linux --- The best things in life are free.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
