On Sat, Jul 10, 2004 at 05:08:26PM -0700, Paul Johnson wrote: > Stelios Asmargianakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I want to ask why to choose Debian than Fedora or ES for example that > > comes with 2.6 kernel and latest packages. > > Wrong question. Right question is: "Why should I chose Fedora or ES > when they ship by default with software that wasn't thoroughly tested, > when I can get a well-tested, rock solid OS from Debian instead?"
Hi Paul,
As someone who used to use redhat and now uses debian, I have become
aware of the 'process' that software goes through to get into 'stable'.
I never found out if Redhat had a similar process. Could you or anyone
else shed some light on this? (Because of RPM-hell I never plan to go
back but just are really curious)
-Kev
--
(__)
(oo)
/------\/
/ | ||
* /\---/\
~~ ~~
...."Have you mooed today?"...
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
