Colin Watson wrote: > Desired state of packages should never have been in /var/lib/dpkg/status > in the first place. (And yes, I've had this discussion with the original > author, who agreed ...)
In that case does a newer version of dpkg corrected this oversight? And if not shouldn't there be one? Then in a future version of the software everything would work as desired? Bob
pgpzKsZ5IAIQz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
