>> If I understand this correctly, users of 'testing' (currently >> 'sarge') can do *nothing* when new security problems arise? They >> must wait for the fix in 'unstable' to make it into testing.
pj> You knew going in that the only "safe" path is stable, you were pj> warned! Certainly! ;-) I still think my new installs should be 'testing'/'sarge'. Two reasons: I believe that the contents of the current 'testing' are pretty solid/safe. Plus, once 'sarge' becomes the new 'stable' (even though I know that's a future, uncertain target) , I'll be OK. Thanks for your comments! -Kenneth -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
