On Friday 14 May 2004 10:17 am, Anthony Campbell wrote: > conclusion was that Unstable is the way to go in preference to Testing, > especially as regards security updates.
It probably is at that, but it sure is more annoying. Packages in Testing break once in awhile. Package in Unstable break three times a week, seems like, and they break in totally obnoxious ways. "Oops, you need to remove everything related to KDE and X so you can install the latest version of the ncurses libraries." Every time I start to track Unstable, I wind up going back to Testing in short order. But if I were running an important server, there's no question that I would use Stable. It's 40,000 years old, but it's, well, STABLE. Like the rock of Gibraltar. -- Michael McIntyre ---- Silvan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Linux fanatic, and certified Geek; registered Linux user #243621 http://www.geocities.com/Paris/Rue/5407/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
