Craig Dickson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Brian Nelson wrote: > >> Tom Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> >> > No, it's not worth it. I was just looking at the g++ man page that >> > lists .cc and .cxx but not .cpp. >> >> Huh? I see: >> >> C++ source files use one of the suffixes `.C', `.cc', `.cxx', `.cpp', >> or `.c++'; preprocessed C++ files use the suffix `.ii'. > > Your quote matches the man page for g++ 2.95. However, the man page for > g++ 3.2 does not mention .cpp. (I would say it should, since it's not at > all an uncommon extension for C++ sources.) It also does not mention .c++.
g++-3.2 doesn't have the proper manpage, at least on my system. http://bugs.debian.org/162843 -- People said I was dumb, but I proved them! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
