On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 03:06:21PM +0200, Burkhard Ritter wrote: > On Sat, 21 Sep 2002, Corrin Lakeland wrote: > > just another question. what about sfs? is it a nfs-alternative and what > is the difference to afs?
sfs indeed can be used as an alternative to nfs. It is (in my experimence) rather easier to set up that coda (which I think may be comparable to afs). It is also much more closely related to nfs, in that it doesn't try to do any offline availability or caching. -- David Roundy http://civet.berkeley.edu/droundy/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
