On Fri, 20 Sep 2002 01:20:21 -0600 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bob Proulx) wrote: > > > > > I'm curious. In what packages can you find these commands? > > > > apt-cache show mozilla-browser > > > I think he was looking for 'type' and 'command', not 'mozilla'. > > Oh, okay. I parsed the grammer the other way. The messages are the > almost same when the command you are looking for, mozilla in this > case, is not found. > > > And they're builtin commands if 'bash' is your shell (and maybe > > others). > > Hopefully lots of others. Those are defined by standards such as > SUSv3. I expect every standard shell to have them. And by standard > that does leave out csh. ;-) But any shell that claims to be a > POSIX shell that could function as /bin/sh on a modern system should > be good to go for those.
echo $SHELL /bin/tcsh You mean this creature isn't POSIX-compliant? I find tcsh to be a more powerfull shell than bash (and this from a big GNU fan). e.g. Bash, unless I under-read the man page, can't do wild-card history searches. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
