On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 07:17:08PM +0100, François TOURDE <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote a message of 32 lines which said:
> Si tu envoies (forward) le [h|sp]am comme ça, ce sont les entêtes de > l'émetteur (soi-même) qui vont être pris en compte par sa-learn, > non? C'est une très bonne chose. Voir http://www.paulgraham.com/better.html pour une explication. But I think the most important difference is probably that they ignored message headers. To anyone who has worked on spam filters, this will seem a perverse decision. And yet in the very first filters I tried writing, I ignored the headers too. Why? Because I wanted to keep the problem neat. I didn't know much about mail headers then, and they seemed to me full of random stuff. There is a lesson here for filter writers: don't ignore data. You'd think this lesson would be too obvious to mention, but I've had to learn it several times. -- Pensez à lire la FAQ de la liste avant de poser une question : http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianFrench Pensez à rajouter le mot ``spam'' dans vos champs "From" et "Reply-To:" To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
