>> Doesn't that contradict with what the patch does? >> >> (...) >> This merely adds a test for the SPARC architecture, but still keeps the >> special case for Solaris. Hence it will still enable alignment on >> Solaris/x86. > > Well, you're quoting part of my mail only which is where the confusion comes > from. In the text, I'm actually saying that the current patch is certainly > not the best approach.
Ah, that clears it up. I thought you submitted a patch to fix this for good here. Makes sense to only address the particular issue here and wait for upstream to implement a permanent solution.
