His problem could be the separate /usr partition which is no longer supported on modern Linux distributions because of the usr-merge. See his attached fstab.
It's not?  Well, I never knew that!

I'm not sure whether the mount command has been moved to /usr/bin yet though. If yes, this could explain the problem.
No, it's /bin/mount.

Adrian

On Mar 29, 2017, at 8:52 AM, Kevin Stabel <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:

Hi Jesse,

Wrong fs type in fstab?  Is it ext3?
Wrong label in fstab?  Try replacing the UUID=etc etc with /dev/sda1

On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 2:35 AM, Jesse Talavera-Greenberg <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:


    On 03/28/2017 05:30 AM, Jesse Talavera-Greenberg wrote:
    However, the /boot partition (which uses ext3) is failing to mount
    How does that manifest? What error message do you get? What are the contents
    of your /etc/fstab?
    Attached to this e-mail.  And the error's manifestation appeared
    in the logs I posted in my previous e-mail.  Specifically this part:

        Mar 27 22:39:23 motherfscker systemd[1]: Mounting /boot...
        Mar 27 22:39:23 motherfscker systemd[1]: var.mount: Directory /var to 
mount over is not empty, mounting anyway.
        Mar 27 22:39:23 motherfscker systemd[1]: Mounting /var...
        Mar 27 22:39:23 motherfscker kernel: des_sparc64: sparc64 des opcodes 
not available.
        Mar 27 22:39:23 motherfscker kernel: md5_sparc64: sparc64 md5 opcode 
not available.
        Mar 27 22:39:23 motherfscker kernel: aes_sparc64: sparc64 aes opcodes 
not available.
        Mar 27 22:39:23 motherfscker systemd[1]: boot.mount: Mount process 
exited, code=exited status=32
        Mar 27 22:39:23 motherfscker systemd[1]: Failed to mount /boot.
        Mar 27 22:39:23 motherfscker systemd[1]: Dependency failed for Local 
File Systems.

    and I don't know why.  The weird thing is that I can mount it manually just 
fine,
    How do you mount it manually? Have you compared it to what's in /etc/fstab?
    I mount it through `mount /dev/sda1 /boot`. That's about it.

    though if I run systemctl default the console stops responding.
    Did you actually read the manpage for systemctl to understand what 
"systemctl
    default" does?

    Quoting:

            default
                Enter default mode. This is mostly equivalent to isolate 
default.target.
    and:
        "isolate" is only valid for start operations and causes all other units 
to
        be stopped when the specified unit is started. This mode is always used 
when
        the isolate command is used.

    So, "systemctl default" on Debian effectively kills all units except for 
the ones
    that are wanted by default.target. Don't run "systemctl default".

    Probably the default.target should be reconfigured in Debian's systemd 
package
    to avoid this problem.
    I don't understand what this means, can you elaborate?  (I don't
    know very much about configuring Debian.)

    That being said, after I manually mounted /boot I was able to SSH
    into the machine like nothing ever happened; it seems like the
    default Linux login prompt just wasn't showing up.  I think
    there's a boot parameter to that effect?  Now I'm confused.



Reply via email to