On 13Nov26:1545-0500, David L. Craig wrote: > On 13Nov26:1437-0500, Mark Haase wrote: > > > Therefore, a Linux distribution has 2 choices: (1) wait for upstream > > patches for bugs/vulnerabilities as they are found, or (2) recompile all > > packages with optimizations disabled. I don't think proposal #2 would get > > very far... > > Well, there's always -O1 as opposed to no optimization. > BTW, -O1 is the minimum permitted for making gcc or glibc, > I forget which.
I'm rebuilding glibc 2.18 now with -O1 after it refused -O0, but binutils 2.23.2, gcc 4.8.1, and g++ 4.8.1 are fine with -O0. -- <not cent from sell> May the LORD God bless you exceedingly abundantly! Dave_Craig______________________________________________ "So the universe is not quite as you thought it was. You'd better rearrange your beliefs, then. Because you certainly can't rearrange the universe." __--from_Nightfall_by_Asimov/Silverberg_________________ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20131127024922.GA12419@dlc-dt
