Hello, On Sunday 18 April 2010 22:52:41 Jan Lühr wrote: > Hello, > > On Friday 16 April 2010 10:01:46 you wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Jason Self wrote/schrieb @ 15.04.2010 21:52: > > > Kurt Roeckx <k...@roeckx.be> wrote .. > > > > > >> What does this mean exactly? > > > > deb http://volatile.debian.org/debian-volatile \ > > lenny-proposed-updates/volatile main contrib non-free > > The imho more interesting point is: What does it mean in the long term? > The current situation is: > Volatile has clamav 0.95, while upstream has 0.96. There are security > related issues in 0.95 (DoS etc.?) [1] that might affect(?) volatile -
> [1] > http://git.clamav.net/gitweb?p=clamav-devel.git;a=blob_plain;f=ChangeLog;hb >=clamav-0.95.3 [2] http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/2009/10/05/eol-clamav-094/ sorry, [1] was meant to be http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=577462 Keep smiling yanosz -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/201004182305.36598.debian-secur...@stephan.homeunix.net
