On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:39, Adrian 'Dagurashibanipal' von Bidder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Also you may want to look at the rfc-ignorant.org ones, but reading > nanae I got the impression that they are more trouble than they're > worth.
This thread inspired me to fiddle with my anti-spam settings again. Below is my current Postfix configuration for those who are interested. My latest addition is RHSBL entries. So far rhsbl.sorbs.net has not caught anything (only been on for about 30 mins and it's late in the list). The rfc-ignorant.org entries have been catching a lot, one thing that they cught is yahoo.com because [EMAIL PROTECTED] allegedly doesn't work. I've just sent a test message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] and it hasn't bounced yet... Maybe the Yahoo abuse team are being butt-head's about clicking on the removal URL. smtpd_client_restrictions = permit_mynetworks, reject_rbl_client bl.spamcop.net, reject_rbl_client dnsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rbl_client list.dsbl.org, reject_rbl_client cbl.abuseat.org, reject_rbl_client dnsbl.njabl.org, reject_rbl_client sbl.spamhaus.org, reject_rbl_client relays.ordb.org, reject_rhsbl_client rhsbl.sorbs.net, reject_rhsbl_client dsn.rfc-ignorant.org, reject_rhsbl_client postmaster.rfc-ignorant.org -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page
