Hello, I saw a lot of discution about snort 1.9 on woody. I just whant to tell that we do need the 1.9 ! why don't we use an another directory (like contrib) where we can put unstable softwares built for the stable distribution ?
For those who are interested in snort 1.9 without using unstable and without last glibc and uploaded it to a website : http://acdessec.chez.tiscali.fr/ Please email me if you find bugs in these packages. Regards, Sebastien Desse > -----Message d'origine----- > De : Gustavo Franco [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Envoyé : mercredi 11 décembre 2002 12:57 > À : debian-security@lists.debian.org > Objet : Re: Updating Snort Signatures In Stable ? > > > On Tue, 2002-12-10 at 16:52, Matt Zimmerman wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 04:36:08PM -0200, Gustavo Franco wrote: > > > > > No, you can't rebuild snort version from unstable. > > > > Who can't? You can't? I just did, and it was not only > possible, but easy. > Nick Boyce! > > > apt-get build-dep snort && apt-get source -b snort > > > > > And the snort updates? > > > > Yes, they are built from the same source package. > Will Nick do it daily,weekly or monthly? See below. > > > > The best alternative for you is apt-pinning feature, you can read more > > > about it at apt-howto[1]. > > > > Nope. I know how to use apt, thank you very much. And I prefer not to > > install unstable glibc on my stable systems. > It isn't for you! > > Unstable glibc is a bad idea, i known.But and about unstable snort? One > more time, and the snort updates? > > > bye, > Gustavo Franco -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
