Mike Renfro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 01:07:19PM -0500, Dast wrote: > > > So my question is, is it safer to host the NFS from the DMZ and > > mount remotely on machines in the internal network, or host the NFS > > from a machine on the internal network and remotely mount in the > > DMZ? Or does it matter? > > I suppose it depends on what sort of activity you need to do over the > NFS mount.
Thanks for the feedback. That certainly gives me something to chew on. The mount will be just bulk file storage. I haven't decided if the machine in the DMZ needs read/write or just read access, however. Everything on that mount should be publicly accessible to all users, so in terms of one user getting another's files, that isn't an issue. -- --Dast "Practice allows me to receive information like faxes." Pharoahe Monch -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]