Phillip Hofmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2002 at 02:29:22PM -0500, John Goerzen wrote: > >> No, it's a perfectly valid reason. Just because other admins do not >> perfectly mirror your opinions does not mean that they are stupid. Not >> only that, but there are a number of Debian users and developers that, >> for various reasons, find themselves listed in things like DUL or >> rfc-ignorant, despite the fact that they are using services for >> legitimate purposes. >> > I happen to agree, what if their is a BIND worm going around that takes > down 10% of the net's NS servers...now no one would have reverse > resolution...just a thought...silly and unlikely though it may be.
I suggest that "fantastic" reasons are unnecessary. That someone might have a valid point to contribute is enough reason to permit them; that their domain administrator doesn't know what they're doing (eg no reverse DNS or no postmaster@) really doesn't strike me as a valid reason to prevent everyone else on this list from making up our own silly minds. Of course, there's always this handy X-RBL-Warning: header that could be inserted in the mail as it comes from the list server... Nah, just block or don't block, no compromises allowed ;^] ~Tim -- <http://spodzone.org.uk/> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
