Not "security updates" as such, but since the software has been changed, doesn't testing have its package replaced with the new version?
I can't imagine that a known hole would be deliberately left in a package when an update has already been compiled. This is "testing", not Hamm". > Testing doesn't get security updates, so when the next testing comes > along, its directory on security.debian.org, if it exists at all, will > be empty. > > The only reason woody is getting security updates now is that it's so > close to release this provides a good opportunity to give the > new build > infrastructure a shake-down. > > noah -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
