> Well, still binary patching could be implemented (although, in a rather > osbscure way) using pre-install scripts which would patch the definition > files. However, this would require two packages providing the same > version of the definition files (a patch package and a complete > new-version package) and a whole lot of patch packages dangling around. > So I guess I am writing nonsense.
Umm...silly thought...couldn't we have two packages. The binary then a lib (which the binary depends on) that would contain the defs, then just update the libs? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
