On 01-08-09 Martin Domig wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2001 at 08:03:15PM +1000, Matt Hope wrote:
> [...]
> > : When my friends (2 differnt ones, one of which is planning to switch
> > : to mutt) get the mails, they get it in an attachment, have to save it
> > : and decode it manually (apparently kmail is expecting inline messages).
> > : Obviously, mutt/mutt and kmail/kmail messages are working perfectly.
> > `-
> > 
> > I've seen a few procmail recipes around which remedy this.
> [...]
> 
> I am using the same procmail filter and can say that it works
> perfectly for incoming pgp/gpg mails. However, this does not solve the
> problem with other mail clients that want to have inline PGP messages, and
> those are many. 
> Is there a way to make mutt send inline PGP messages instead of the
> MIME attachment form?

Is it so difficult to look first into the fine manual of mutt or call
man muttrc and look therefor an answer before asking the list? If you
would have done one of the first know actions, you would have found the
option "pgp_create_traditional". That option might help you very much,
but instead I would suggest that the other MUA's get fixed.

Christian
-- 
           Debian Developer (http://www.debian.org)
1024/26CC7853 31E6 A8CA 68FC 284F 7D16  63EC A9E6 67FF 26CC 7853

Attachment: pgpPc25ghRtkT.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to