> Yes, but when you're upgrading your existing packages, and the > dependencies have changed to such a degree to require *new* packages, > that almost always implies a major change, such as a stable -> testing > transition, not a security fix for a package in stable (which is what > security.debian.org is for).
Yes, that makes sense. I guess my point is that from the manpage paragraph, this wasn't immediately clear, so I wouldn't be surprised if there are other people who misinterpreted it the same way I did. Thanks for the clarification. KEN -- Kenneth J. Pronovici <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Personal Homepage: http://www.skyjammer.com/~pronovic/ "I have zero tolerance for zero-tolerance policies."
