On Thu, 28 Jun 2001, Davy Gigan wrote:
>
> > They can both solve my problem, but pheraps Nat was designed for me.
> > When I say Nat i mean "iptables nat" because is the only Nat I know under
> > linux. Yes, what I'm going to do with a bridge could be seen as a Nat.
> > Oooooo.
> I think so. I think you don't need a bridge and you can simply configure
> a firewall / gateway for your private network.
..that again requies to touch router's routes...
> > And why I need bridging...? because I don't want to modify the router as
> > my old good poor manager asked to me...!
> As someaone already said : it's another level of security to modify
> your router.
What I'm doing is a sort of a personal firewall distribution based on
debian, that could work everywhere... this is why not to unscrew the
router. And I know there are already good firewall distributions around,
but I prefere something I can modify my own...
Ok, on yesterday I switched the system on; it seems to work well! On the
same PC there is running squid too.
Ah, do you know (ore someone else knows) wich ports I need for incoming
ssh as a remote control? Port 22, ok, but does ssh need some other
auth port? Yes, someone said to me that ssh isn't so sure, but I can't
live without.... :)
Hi Davy. ;)
--
Marco Tassinari 0328 1187801
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.taffi.it
