On Tue, 19 Jun 2001 09:29:13 +0100 Brett Parker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why not use XEmacs instead of Emacs and kill the need for this > package? Unfortunately there's a lot of elisp that just won't work under one of the two. I finally gave up and evicted all the GNU/Emacs crap from my .xemacs, and now, amazingly, finally have the damn thing under 250K. > better still, use mutt which has all the support in > there. Mutt can't handle MH folders properly (named sequence support to name but one). No thanks. -- J C Lawrence [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------(*) http://www.kanga.nu/~claw/ The pressure to survive and rhetoric may make strange bedfellows
