On Thu, May 24, 2001 at 12:09:55PM -0400, Ed Street wrote: > Hello, > > that's simple ;) If they was stable/non-exploitable then we'd be using rpc > inplace of ssh ;)
Wha??? There's a difference between exploitable and sniffable. RPC doesn't use encryption, except for something Sun cooked up with DES. I don't know the details. Besides that, ssh has _way_ different uses than RPC. (of course, you could write a remote shell kind of program using rpc, but why bother? No such thing exists now, but ssh kicks ass.) -- #define X(x,y) x##y Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X([EMAIL PROTECTED] , ns.ca) "The gods confound the man who first found out how to distinguish the hours! Confound him, too, who in this place set up a sundial, to cut and hack my day so wretchedly into small pieces!" -- Plautus, 200 BCE