All,
Carlos wrote:
> Sorry to disturb you all, but I am not too interested in the huge
> threads that have appeared in debian-security lately. I subscribed to
> this list mostly to get noticed of security problems in the
> distribution itself, and it seems like people are using it to get
> answers now (like debian-user focused on security). Perhaps the
> listmaster could create debian-security-announce, as a moderated,
> security announcements-focused list, and leave debian-security for
> general discussion? Thanks.
Gee, that sounds like a good idea. In fact, SUCH a good idea that
it's been implemented for years.
Seriously though, if there is anybody else on debian-security who
is NOT also subscribed to debian-security-announce, you should
probably do so. There have been a few debian-security posts
recently asking about the status of something for which a fix was
announced on debian-security-announce a couple of days
previously.
My understanding is that debian-security IS more or less a debian-
user for security issues. :)
Paul Haesler
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"We are the Steely-Pips and we have no fear, no
spats in our vats, no rules, no schools, no gloom,
no evil influence of the moon, for we have a machine,
a dream of a machine, with springs and gears and
perfect in every respect."
Stanislaw Lem, The Cyberiad (Trurl's Prescription)
