Steve wrote: > > "Steve" == Steve <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > ... I suppose it would be nice if packages could supply their own > > violations and ignore files to make this easier ... > > Well, the feeling seems to be that this is a worthwhile project. I'll > approach the maintainer and see if he'll accept the changes. However, > the package it looking pretty orphaned (long outstanding bugs, some of > them grave/security-related). If I don't hear anything back I'll > put myself in the new-maintainers queue with the intention of updating > the package. <weekly rant, just ignore> Well, the package is not orphaned, I have already fixed nearly all bug reports. The reason why the package has not been updated in a while is that I am in the NM queue for myself (since about 1,5 years....). Now I am approved by an AM, but still waiting for my account to be created. </weekly rant, just ignore>
Other than that, I must apologize. My mail server had problems delivering mails, so that answers to these suggestions are sent right now (and yesterday when I wrote them). best greets, Rene
