On Mon, 23 Aug 2004 13:07, Thomas Bushnell BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Russell Coker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Removing developers who don't meet certain criteria (EG no package > > uploads for 6 months) from active status makes a lot of sense. > > Anyone care to propose a GR? > > Careful about terminology here. I wouldn't say "remove", just we drop > them from the list of signatures. They are still Debian developers.
Removing from active status seems appropriate to me. If we are afraid of compromised packages then we can't have an automated method of changing status back to active. -- http://www.coker.com.au/selinux/ My NSA Security Enhanced Linux packages http://www.coker.com.au/bonnie++/ Bonnie++ hard drive benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/postal/ Postal SMTP/POP benchmark http://www.coker.com.au/~russell/ My home page -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
