Anyone verify this is for real and not "social engineering" and a trojen?
Philipp wrote:
there is a reason:
* Joshua Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040717 04:40]: Unlike all the other implementations I've seen so far, it doesn't replace the existing APT package; it just adds a new method.
as Joshua explained, the program is _not a replacement_ for apt, but _a method_ apt. so, having a method for apt without having apt doesnt make much sense, does it ?
best regards, philpp
----- Original Message ----- From: "Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 17, 2004 2:25 PM
Subject: [mailinglists] Re: new tool - apt-method-https
* Joshua Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [040717 04:40]:
I've developed a simple HTTPS method for APT using Perl's LWP libraries. Unlike all the other implementations I've seen so far, it doesn't replace the existing APT package; it just adds a new method. Support for client certificates is included. Please try it and give feedback!
More info, including lines for sources.list(5), at http://www.roughtrade.net/linux/
Is there a reason the package depends on apt?
Hochachtungsvoll, Bernhard R. Link
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
