Moritz Muehlenhoff pushed to branch master at Debian Security Tracker / 
security-tracker


Commits:
67f4d5a5 by Moritz Muehlenhoff at 2025-08-19T11:43:32+02:00
binutils fixed in sid

- - - - -


1 changed file:

- data/CVE/list


Changes:

=====================================
data/CVE/list
=====================================
@@ -41691,7 +41691,7 @@ CVE-2025-3202 (A vulnerability classified as critical 
has been found in ageerle
 CVE-2025-3199 (A vulnerability was found in ageerle ruoyi-ai up to 2.0.1 and 
classifi ...)
        NOT-FOR-US: ageerle ruoyi-ai
 CVE-2025-3198 (A vulnerability has been found in GNU Binutils 2.43/2.44 and 
classifie ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32716
        NOTE: 
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=ba6ad3a18cb26b79e0e3b84c39f707535bbc344d
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
@@ -61335,12 +61335,12 @@ CVE-2025-23187 (Due to missing authorization check in 
an RFC enabled function mo
 CVE-2025-1211 (Versions of the package hackney before 1.21.0 are vulnerable to 
Server ...)
        NOT-FOR-US: hackney
 CVE-2025-1181 (A vulnerability classified as critical was found in GNU 
Binutils 2.43. ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant; bug #1108986)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant; bug #1108986)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32643
        NOTE: 
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=931494c9a89558acb36a03a340c01726545eef24
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
 CVE-2025-1180 (A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in GNU 
Binuti ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant; bug #1108986)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant; bug #1108986)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32642
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
 CVE-2025-1179 (A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43. It has been 
rated as c ...)
@@ -61349,14 +61349,14 @@ CVE-2025-1179 (A vulnerability was found in GNU 
Binutils 2.43. It has been rated
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
        NOTE: No exact commits pinpointed, but upstream confirms this fixed in 
2.44
 CVE-2025-1178 (A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43. It has been 
declared a ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant; bug #1108986)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant; bug #1108986)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32638
        NOTE: 
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=75086e9de1707281172cc77f178e7949a4414ed0
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
 CVE-2025-1177 (A vulnerability was found in dayrui XunRuiCMS 4.6.3. It has 
been class ...)
        NOT-FOR-US: dayrui XunRuiCMS
 CVE-2025-1176 (A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43 and classified 
as criti ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant; bug #1108986)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant; bug #1108986)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32636
        NOTE: 
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=f9978defb6fab0bd8583942d97c112b0932ac814
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
@@ -61670,34 +61670,40 @@ CVE-2025-1155 (A vulnerability, which was classified 
as problematic, was found i
 CVE-2025-1154 (A vulnerability, which was classified as critical, has been 
found in x ...)
        NOT-FOR-US: xxyopen Novel
 CVE-2025-1153 (A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in GNU 
Binutils 2. ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32603
        NOTE: 
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=8d97c1a53f3dc9fd8e1ccdb039b8a33d50133150
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
 CVE-2025-1152 (A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in GNU 
Binuti ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32576
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
+       NOTE: These were fixed in master, so 2.45 at the time
 CVE-2025-1151 (A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43. It has been 
rated as p ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32576
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
+       NOTE: These were fixed in master, so 2.45 at the time
 CVE-2025-1150 (A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43. It has been 
declared a ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32576
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
+       NOTE: These were fixed in master, so 2.45 at the time
 CVE-2025-1149 (A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43. It has been 
classified ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32576
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
+       NOTE: These were fixed in master, so 2.45 at the time
 CVE-2025-1148 (A vulnerability was found in GNU Binutils 2.43 and classified 
as probl ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32576
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
+       NOTE: These were fixed in master, so 2.45 at the time
 CVE-2025-1147 (A vulnerability has been found in GNU Binutils 2.43 and 
classified as  ...)
-       - binutils <unfixed> (unimportant)
+       - binutils 2.45-3 (unimportant)
        NOTE: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32556
        NOTE: binutils not covered by security support
+       NOTE: These were fixed in master, so 2.45 at the time
 CVE-2025-1099 (This vulnerability exists in Tapo C500 Wi-Fi camera due to 
hard-coded  ...)
        NOT-FOR-US: TP-Link
 CVE-2024-8685 (Path-Traversal vulnerability in Revolution Pi version 
2022-07-28-revpi ...)



View it on GitLab: 
https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/commit/67f4d5a58962d02858a707b5e1fb98f129b9366a

-- 
View it on GitLab: 
https://salsa.debian.org/security-tracker-team/security-tracker/-/commit/67f4d5a58962d02858a707b5e1fb98f129b9366a
You're receiving this email because of your account on salsa.debian.org.


_______________________________________________
debian-security-tracker-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-security-tracker-commits

Reply via email to