On Sun, 2024-07-21 at 09:37 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote: > Hi Diane, > > Am Sun, Jul 07, 2024 at 03:50:50PM -0700 schrieb Diane Trout: > > > > I was wondering how to do this... > > > > On Salsa the i386 test runner failed with this test case, which > > seems > > very much like a 32-bit issue. > > Since you did not got any answer on this. If this problem occures on > i386 *only* we might start a discussion whether we want to keep i386 > support for numba and its rdepends. There might be some applications > for arm32 bit in scientific devices but as far as I understood Debian > is
It does look like it's a 32bit issue. I see the same erroron armel too. https://ci.debian.net/packages/n/numba/unstable/armel/49527832/#L3098 > > > I'm just uploaded numba_0.59.1+dfsg-2 with Build-Depends: > > architecture- > > is-64-bit. Hopefully that gets further through the builder. > > Ahhh, well, this seems to be a sensible decision even excluding 32bit > arm which is fine for me as well. It might mean a chain of removal > requests of several rdepends but we need to do this sooner or later > anyway. Maybe I can look to see if I can figure out a solution, but I kind of want to see if I can get numba working on x86 and arm64 first. And right now, there's test failures on the CI server that I can't reproduce locally. The upstream test harnesses mention issues with many core machines, and capped the number of simulatenous test processes to 16 on ppc64. I pushed a -3 version that tries that limit on x86_64, but it hasn't it made to CI yet. Diane
