On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 02:55:49PM +0200, Jan Beyer wrote: > David Bremner wrote am 4/8/2009 12:30 PM: > > Michael Hanke wrote: > > > >> On Tue, Apr 07, 2009 at 05:16:00PM -0300, David Bremner wrote: > >>> > >>> Xournal is in debian, and seems to work OK. Is jarnal superior to > >>> xournal in some way? > > > >> Okular also has annotation capabilities and is in Debian. > > > > My experience with okular annotation has not been too positive so far. > > Some of it is just bugs because the features are new, but also I find > > the current okular model of storing the annotations in ~/.kde not very > > useful. On the other hand, okular deals with PDF as PDF, rather than > > rasterizing it, as I believe xournal does. So these two at least have > > different niches. > >From my quick look at the xournal homepage, I also had the impression > that xournal uses pdftoppm or something like this. And keeping > modifications in your local home-directory is only fine as long as you > only use the file from this one account...
Hmm, I have used xournal before and it can both store anotations as an overlay, as well as producing a PDF with the original content and the annotations overlayed. Michael -- GPG key: 1024D/3144BE0F Michael Hanke http://apsy.gse.uni-magdeburg.de/hanke ICQ: 48230050 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
