Jörg-Volker Peetz <[email protected]> writes: > Chris Walker wrote: > > > > I suspect "simulation" is too generic. The packages you list perfom > > abinitio quantum mechanics to determine structure[1] > > > <snip> > > I support this point of view. "Simulation", IMO, also comprises packages like > gerris, FeeFem++, or other CAE-programs. It is a classification lateral to the > scientific fields chemistry, engineering, mathematics, physics, etc.
Thinking aloud, but would this generality across scientific fields make it a good debtag for science packages? Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
