Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is an interesting proposal. If LAM upstream is dead, I too would > support removing its dependencies -- but leaving LAM itself for users, > as you suggest.
http://www.lam-mpi.org/ says: "LAM/MPI is now in a maintenance mode. Bug fixes and critical patches are still being applied, but little real "new" work is happening in LAM/MPI. This is a direct result of the LAM/MPI Team spending the vast majority of their time working on our next-generation MPI implementation -- Open MPI." Chris -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
