On Tue, 2018-01-23 at 20:36 +0100, W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Kurt, many thanks for the quick reply and your packing work! > > On 2018-01-22 15:03, kkremit...@gmail.com wrote: > > Yes, I am looking into packaging PySide 2, although the upstream is > > still a little ways out from being ready for a release [1], e.g. > > they > > haven't picked an initial version number. > > Maybe PySide 2 should go to experimental then?
That would make sense, although having just checked the upstream development progress notes on their wiki, it looks like they're getting closer and closer... > > > Also, beyond trying to get OpenCASCADE 7.2 packaged (which I would > > appreciate any additional feedback for, as it's quite large for my > > 2nd > > Debian package!), > > You should probably ask for feedback in the Debian science team, > that maintains OCE, FreeCAD, and netgen. Thanks, I'll write something up for feedback. > > The only minor point from my side: For such a large package as > OpenCASCADE it is probably a good idea, not to have the complete > version history (4280 commits) in the Debian git repo, but only > the releases in the "upstream" branch, with added debian-dir in > the "master" branch. But that's purely matter of taste... > Ah, I wasn't sure on that point, glad you cleared it up. I have updated the repo on salsa.d.o. > > we are also wanting to update the netgen package both > > to v6.2.x from its current 4.9.13, as well as to compile it against > > the > > new OpenCASCADE 7.2 package I'm working on. > > Could you open a bug against the netgen package asking for a new > package version? And block this bug #888026 by it? TIA! Done! https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=888712 -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
