On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 at 16:02:08 +0100, Alexander Wirt wrote: > > On Tue, 26 Dec 2017, Anton Gladky wrote: > > > I think we should request the list something like > > > debian-science-maintain...@lists.debian.org > > > and use it instead of @lists.alioth.debian.org > > > > We don't want maintainter lists on l.d.o > > I assume the intended policy is that lists.debian.org is suitable for > discussion lists (like the GNOME Team's debian-gtk-gnome@lists and > the Games Team's debian-devel-games@lists), but not for the maintainer > address of record that gets all the bugs and other bulk mail (like the > GNOME Team's current pkg-gnome-maintainers@lists.alioth and the Games > Team's pkg-games-devel@lists.alioth)? > > A few packages and pseudo-packages already have lists.d.o mailing lists > as their Maintainer, for instance debian-boot and debian-kernel. I know > some GNOME team developers have suggested having debian-gtk-gnome as our > canonical maintainer address: Alexander, presumably your response means > that this would be considered inappropriate, and the GNOME team should > keep debian-gtk-gnome as a discussion list only? We are happy running lists like debian-boot that are used for discussions, bugs and commit messages. But please not things like bugs and commit messages only lists. So if -gtk decides a one for all list fits them we are happy with it, but we won't run for example a -gkt-commits and -gtk-bugs list.
Alex -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
