On 17/09/16 at 10:13 +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Fri, 8 Jul 2016 19:23:48 +0200 Francesco Poli wrote: > > > On Thu, 7 Jul 2016 19:27:47 +0200 Lucas Nussbaum wrote: > [...] > > > It seems that the main SCOTCH copyright holders is Francois Pellegrini, > > > > It is my understanding that he is the main author, but the copyright > > holder is INRIA (along with ENSEIRB and CNRS). > > Please see > > https://tracker.debian.org/media/packages/s/scotch/copyright-5.1.12b.dfsg-2 > > > > However, I agree with you that François is really the person to be > > persuaded. > > > > Once he is convinced that SCOTCH should be re-licensed, I think he > > will know who has to be contacted, in order to obtain the necessary > > paperwork. Or, at least, I hope so. > > > > > who is very active in the French Free Software community. One of the > > > colleagues (same Inria research team) of Francois is Brice Goglin, who > > > is a DD. So it might be useful to try to contact them. > > > > This is the kind of help I have been asking for since I filed these > > bug reports. > > If you can get in touch with François Pellegrini, directly or > > indirectly, and explain the issue to him in a convincing manner, > > then I would be really really grateful. > > > > As I said, I tried multiple times, but François no longer replies > > to my e-mail messages. That's why I need help from people more likely > > to be listened to. > [...] > > Hello again Lucas, > is there any progress on this issue?
Not that I'm aware of, sorry. Lucas -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
