On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 12:07:11PM +0200, Massimiliano Leoni wrote: > The latest update of binutils to version 2.26.1-1 makes it imopssible to > compile against trilinos. The linker complains > > /usr/bin/ld: warning: libbfd-2.26-system.so, needed by > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/5/../../../x86_64-linux-gnu/libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so, > not found (try using -rpath or -rpath-link)
interesting. the trilinos-teuchos12 package depends on binutils (>= 2.26), binutils (<< 2.27) if that's correct, we shouldn't link libtrilinos_teuchoscore.so to a particular revision of libbfd-2.26-system.so. how would that be possible? otoh, if libbfd-2.26.1-system.so - is meant to replace libbfd-2.26-system.so, shouldn't there be a symlink? - is NOT meant to provide libbfd-2.26-system.so, then why are these not coinstallable? I'm not trying to argue that this is a bug in binutils, i just don't understand. my idea would be to change the binutils dependency to (=2.26), but that feels a bit silly (isn't that dependency automatic?). cheers felix -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
