On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 06:36:36PM +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Hi Mattia,
Hey Andreas!
> what about
> RM: rivet [armel armhf]
> to decruft rivet and 'get rid of' this FTBFS?
well, you wouldn't get rid of the FTBFS, just lower its severity to
non-RC.
I don't know if that's the right call: I'd consider it if that would
unblock testing migration, but here it doesn't (as there are rc bugs in
the dependencies…). Furthermore, I feel uneasy pushing something
unmaintained in testing, I "accidentally" did with fastjet, but really
those packages don't have an active maintainer right now.
Anyway, feel free to :)
--
regards,
Mattia Rizzolo
GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`.
more about me: https://mapreri.org : :' :
Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri `. `'`
Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
