Your message dated Mon, 09 May 2016 18:00:00 +0000 with message-id <e1azptm-0003kf...@franck.debian.org> and subject line Bug#821221: Removed package(s) from unstable has caused the Debian Bug report #799195, regarding python-scientific: FTBFS during rebuild against netcdf 4.4.0 to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 799195: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=799195 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: python-scientific Version: 2.9.4-3 Severity: serious Hi The python-scientific package FTBFS during a rebuild against netcdf 4.4.0 (a transition). Though I cannot tell if the issue is directly related to netcdf or some other change in unstable since the upload. The relevant part of the log appears to be: """ changing mode of build/scripts-2.7/task_manager from 664 to 775 changing mode of build/scripts-2.7/bsp_virtual from 664 to 775 rm -f Src/MPI/*.o cd Src/MPI && PYTHONPATH=$(echo /«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/lib.*-2.7) USE_MPICH=yes /usr/bin/python compile.py Traceback (most recent call last): File "compile.py", line 8, in <module> from Scientific import N File "/«PKGBUILDDIR»/build/lib.linux-x86_64-2.7/Scientific/N.py", line 6, in <module> from numpy.oldnumeric import * ImportError: No module named oldnumeric make[1]: *** [override_dh_auto_build] Error 1 debian/rules:27: recipe for target 'override_dh_auto_build' failed make[1]: Leaving directory '/«PKGBUILDDIR»' make: *** [build-arch] Error 2 """ The issue affected all builds of the package except powerpc (no clue why powerpc got free of it). Anyway, a timely fix would be appreciated so we can finish the netcdf transition without having to remove python-scientific from testing. Thanks, ~Niels
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Version: 2.9.4-3+rm Dear submitter, as the package python-scientific has just been removed from the Debian archive unstable we hereby close the associated bug reports. We are sorry that we couldn't deal with your issue properly. For details on the removal, please see https://bugs.debian.org/821221 The version of this package that was in Debian prior to this removal can still be found using http://snapshot.debian.org/. This message was generated automatically; if you believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive administrators by mailing ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org. Debian distribution maintenance software pp. Scott Kitterman (the ftpmaster behind the curtain)
--- End Message ---
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
