Francesco Poli: > On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 15:34:44 +0000 Niels Thykier wrote: > >> Francesco Poli: >>> [...] >> >> Hi, > > Hello Niels, > thanks for your prompt reply. > >> >> AFAICT, the FTP masters are the authoritative source on dealing with >> license issues and they have not yet made a ruling. > > Yes, and that's the problem: they seem to never answer, no matter who > and when tries to ask for a reply. >
Sorry, but I cannot help with that part. :-/ Though please note that silence might not be absence of progress. As I recall, they were completely silent during the zfs/linux license issue despite working on it. Can't say if that is an apt comparison though (I don't usually deal with licensing issues). > Am I writing to the right e-mail address? > I originally wrote to <ftpmas...@debian.org> (which is listed in > <https://www.debian.org/intro/organization>), but I see that you wrote > to <ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org>. > Which one should I use? > To be honest, I have no idea where ftpmas...@ftp-master.debian.org got from. I do not remember adding it manually. >> >> * I see no reason for the Release Team to be involving at this point as >> we cannot answer this inquiry. >> >> However, should the FTP masters rule it to be a license incompatibility, >> please do not hesitate to bump the severity to RC. > > Could someone prod the FTP masters to analyze the issue and provide an > authoritative statement? > > Thanks for your time. > > It seems to me that you just did? Thanks, ~Niels
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
