Your message dated Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:13:24 +0100 with message-id <56e93fd4.9080...@debian.org> and subject line Re: urdfdom: FTBFS on several architectures has caused the Debian Bug report #815814, regarding urdfdom: FTBFS on several architectures to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 815814: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=815814 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Source: urdfdom Version: 0.4.1-1 Severity: serious Your package failed to build on several architectures with: CMake Error at CMakeLists.txt:41 (find_package): Could not find a configuration file for package "urdfdom_headers" that is compatible with requested version "0.4". The following configuration files were considered but not accepted: /usr/share/urdfdom_headers/cmake/urdfdom_headers-config.cmake, version: 0.4.0 (64bit) Logs at: https://buildd.debian.org/status/logs.php?pkg=urdfdom&ver=0.4.1-1 Emilio
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---On Thu, 25 Feb 2016 15:35:31 +0100 Jochen Sprickerhof <debian-...@jochen.sprickerhof.de> wrote: > So we can either make all packages using this arch dependent, or fix the cmake > template. Any opinions? Fixed by making urdfdom-headers arch:any. Andreas
--- End Message ---
-- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
