-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 Dear Mattia,
Le 27/02/2016 12:29, Mattia Rizzolo a écrit : >> The feature that I would need for e.g. the yorick package is the >> list of architectures on which each implementation is available. >> This is what I currently check and hardcode by hand. I guess this >> is also what other people do when they provide packages with >> distinct names for each flavour. Yes, it is certainly loosing of its usefulness... > Guess I can do that too. I personally think it's kind of pointless > as of now, where mpich is available everywhere and openmpi is > available on all but m68k (not considering powerpcspe that > yesterday has been resurrected from ashes…) > > Anyway, What about: > > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/mpi-defaults.g it/commit/?id=57d37c200258e7512733d7ee36aade8bf806ffea > > ? Perfect, thanks. > I do think this is a bigger improvment than hardcoding this in a > donzen of packages, everyone with its own data source. > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJW1BQXAAoJEJOUU0jg3ChAR5cQAK8oGwvRameitL5ZMiVAAAki LzJNYaBUJIupsg5/WsUyd/4arzJOkXPaWOOyWCyo5f79DjEXmYXfC/9oZsZXIKtu 0XJUZQFVS9UaieWhPRLTDcUbEA77wSCl8qOgpRDtPPdVgN69au6RajKe8TPx87GY BJVrvO+4du3P9hN8PcXCg/dIrxJ+LI88iURPzFPlbsT4THokH1Z4YwkuVPkNXRxp 4t3XOjcPLYa4V5IBJZGCbQ02xXyzsdHGYid3IDlLhGAHO59jK68IHAGlwa48eZrw eR7e+zOwmA14+ViEqD24DgQU8yOCgZDVU5kGTZ4yDXLWatZdp+9yV4AKr/UNOFoI yPYFmSI55ooOtydIJwwzIOMMhrzAn4t90m7nfJXCqkw3zRsRiZb8LBnzL5TvUQR8 92rgElndITHA+QXBCkdGqNaeHKGi6wTRHdy030UTOlqUglfUUaQLpQGto7NbPm93 7l6SwKwTiMS+J/BxAyMt9rqAUpj2YyNkpwGVHRdue8EByTAWnQV2X6ksrBpHK81w RNSHUkn3a4ydKr4YJO2NlyNl+m7fuhu4J3gd+2JMaApuJAL6dSYaZJ7BSvLYm31m RYQB8s9ux6ikqKIjRA4dKjsbgEqqqNCzrb5rRrxAgoy70mecJBx/EuMR7ibKSu2z Kvprrazm7EM7zLuhxR73 =OgYk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- debian-science-maintainers mailing list debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/debian-science-maintainers
